Facebook Embed Plug Script

Showing posts with label barack obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label barack obama. Show all posts

Obama Admin twists Bibi's words to wrest Americans' protection of "Islamophobic" Israel against deal to enable Islamist Iran amassing nuclear material

Obama Admin and lapdog media vilify Israel to fulfill Obama's aspiration- grease US shift from Israel towards Iran as regional power, critics say; 
"Obama Pursuing His Ideological Ambition to Weaken Israel
by Peter Wehner in Commentary 3/24/15

Pres. Obama is using Prime Minister Netanyahu’s comments to achieve an end he has clearly wanted all along: the weakening of the Jewish state. Mr. Obama is the product of a progressive milieu, including in the academy, where hostility to Israel is widespread. 
 

As president, there have been constraints on how much Mr. Obama could do to undermine Israel. But the president has seized upon comments by Mr. Netanyahu leading up to the Israeli election to advance his agenda – in this case, considering reversing decades of U.S. policy by turning to the United Nations to impose a two-state solution. (This is only one piece in a much larger puzzle.)  Read more
Why is NBC 's Meet the Press host Chuck Todd behaving as Pres. Obama's henchman in 'gotcha'-interviewing Israel's Amb. Ron Dermer? Mark Levin gives examples in this audio excerpt



Mark Levin explores Obama's anti-Israel/
pro-Iran policies as a threat to global safety.
Stanley Kurtz wrote "Radical-in-Chief"

Author, Stanley Kurtz, ("Radical-in-Chief") appeared on radio's Mark Levin Show on 23 March to explain how it ought be no surprise that Obama is treating Israel with such contempt these days. In "What Obama Thinks of Israel," (National Review 21 March 15) Mr. Kurtz asks,
"Has Obama been gunning for a battle with Israel like the one we’re seeing now from day one? Yes. Obama’s break with Israel was both predictable and predicted. (Read more)
Mr. Kurtz shows how Obama is really just reverting to what he believed before he ran for president in 2008, when he
was pals with Edward Saeed, Rashid Khalidi, and Ali Abunimah of the Arab-American Action Network. (Right Scoop). 

Stanley Kurtz, references his Pro-Palestinian-in-Chief in National Review May 2011, in which he laid out these alliances and issues.
The continuing influence of Obama’s pro-Palestinian sentiments is the best way to make sense of the president’s recent tilt away from Israel. 
Mark Levin denounces anti-Semitism from White House
Mark Levin called for a national discussion about the anti-Semitism which reeks from Obama's administration in conversation with Sean Hannity.


Mark Levin: "The fact of the matter, Sean, I want to say this and it’s important. Eric Holder said this nation is full of cowards because we won’t have a discussion about race. Well, I think this nation needs to have a discussion about what’s going on in this White House and this administration about anti-Semitism." (Video credit: Sophia Duffy)

Andrew Breitbart: Don't leave Israel's safety in Barack Obama's hands

Andrew Breitbart on Israel under Obama Democrat administration
Andrew Breitbart: Obama's harsh treatment of Netanyahu manifests his anti-Israelist indoctrination; Obama proved untrustworthy for Israel's security.

Israel National News reported today, "Netanyahu to Demand Obama Commit to Military Action in Iran."  Prime Minister Netanyahu will demand that President Barack Obama commit to a strike on Iran if sanctions fail, say sources.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will press U.S. President Barack Obama for an explicit threat of military action against Iran if sanctions fail and Tehran's nuclear program advances beyond specified “red lines,” it was reported on Thursday. 
According to the British Guardian, Netanyahu is expected to raise the issue during his meeting on Monday at the White House with Obama. 
The report quoted diplomats as having said that Israel is angered by the Obama administration's public disparaging of early military action against Iran, saying that it weakens the prospect of Tehran taking the warnings from Israel seriously. 
While the two sides are attempting to agree on a joint public statement to paper over the divide, the Guardian noted, the talks will not be made easier by a deepening distrust in which the Israelis question Obama's commitment to confront Iran. 
One diplomatic source was quoted as having told the Guardian that Netanyahu and Obama “are poles apart.”
Jewish Conservative activist, Andrew Breitbart, believed that Pres. Barack Obama, under the anti-Israelist tutelage of Orientalist Prof. Edward Said, can not be trusted to provide security for the Jewish state of Israel. In June, 2011, Mr. Breitbart told JooTube that the pro-Palestinian / anti-Israelist academic and political culture Mr. Obama was indoctrinated in manifests in Obama's harsh treatment of Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

 


JooTube: What do you think about Obama's treatment of Netanyahu at first, and then how Congress reacted to him?


Andrew Breitbart: The body-language of Obama sitting next to Netanyahu showed... you can tell the disgust that Barack Obama had towards Netanyahu- that this is an enemy of his, not just a visiting dignitary. And this is why (even though I've been against the birthers, saying stop it, guys) I have been a "course-er"- I believe that we need to see what classes he took when he was at Columbia and Occidental- and I think that you're going to see that Edward Said played an important role in his educational background. I think that the missing Los Angeles Times video of Rashid Khalidi, who is a pro-Palestinian professor- where clearly Barack Obama praised this man.

The American media does not want you to see - especially since the American media is covering up so that Jewish liberals will see, that we voted the most anti-Israel, most anti-Jew person in the history of this country - and that they knew that he had to get through that group of people, that donor base (I would call them my bretheren, I'm Jewish) the dumb, liberal Jews who can't figure out that this guy does not have Israel in his interests. It's so clear. Why is the L.A. Times hiding the Rashid Khalidi tape? It's now more than ever- we need to see what's on the Khalidi tape. And his grades. Edward Said is dead. But there is a hard-core leftist, anti-Israel bent that I saw with my own eyes after 9/11 at the Federal Building - shut down 2 lanes of traffic. Not only was there anti-Americanism from the organized left - from the professors, from the hard-left- it was also against Israel. The day that we were hit the hardest by a purely villainous group of people, these people were trying to figure out how this could be turned against Israel, how this could be turned against America. And I believe that Barack Obama sits right in the center- of the epicenter of that leftist philosophy. I am not religious, but the conservative Christians of this country have Israel's back. Without them, Israel would be up shit's creek. And the very idea that liberal Jews side with a Barack Obama, side with a Rashid Khalidi, side with an Edward Said ... it is a suicidal pact for the sake of- I don't even know - what are you getting in return? Nothing.

JooTube: In terms of those who would donate and support his re-election coffers?

Breitbart: I want to see the percentage of people who are either suicidal or scientifically-proveably stupid. Because of their support of Barack Obama and being liberal-Jew Zionists. It's suicide or stupidity- it's either one or the other. Theses people, the organized left, the professors in the Humanities Departments on campus have been anti-Israel. We've been brainwashing our kids in this Rashid Khalidi / Edward Said, Orientalism bullshit for too long.

JooTube: Arafatism?

Breitbart: Yes, Arafatism, which is hypocrisy- speaking out of one side of their mouth in Arabic and then speaking another way in English. And all you have to do is look at the transcripts and you see these people do not have democracy at heart- they don't see a future of co-existence... they are a warring faction who want Israel dead! Question: Are you concerned about Islamists infiltrating this administration? Breitbart: Absolutely, because there is no transparency with this group of people. Until I get to see the Khalidi tape, I'm allowed to harbor doubts about this man (Obama) and Israel- and this man and America.

Amb. John Bolton contradicts Obama's claim, calling his "The most anti-Israel administration in history"

Speaking after remarks delivered at Stephen S. Wise Temple in Los Angeles, December 6, 2011.

Netanyahu on Fox News: U.S. - Israel relations, peace-process, can Iran's nuclear weapons be contained?

Israel's Prime Minister says, "I don't think we can make peace with an organization that seeks our destruction. That's Hamas. But I think we can make peace with the Palestinian Authority.



Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with Chris Wallace of Fox News Sunday, which aired on July 11th. In these videos, they discuss Israel's readiness for direct peace negotiations, but the Palestinians' unwillingness to negotiate peace directly with Israel; whether Netanyahu has been dissatisfied with U.S. policy on nuclear resolutions; and issues surrounding Iran's nuclear weapons program. He cautions on the U.S. administration's notion of that a nuclear Iran can be contained.



Here is the transcript from the Fox News Sunday interview with PM Netanyahu:

CHRIS WALLACE, HOST: Prime Minister Netanyahu, welcome back to "FOX NEWS SUNDAY". There's been a lot of chatter this week about direct talks with the Palestinians, but I want to start with what there is to negotiate. Do you really believe that you can make peace with the Palestinians when Hamas controls Gaza, has a lot of support in the West Bank and won't recognize Israel's right to exist?

PM NETANYAHU: I don't think we can make peace with an organization that seeks our destruction. That's Hamas. But I think we can make peace with the Palestinian Authority. It requires a lot of courage from our side, from me, and it also requires courage from President Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority. It's going to be a very tough negotiation, but one that I think our peoples are ripe for.

Is Hamas going to be a part of it? No, as long as it wants to destroy Israel, it's not going to be a part of it. Now, at this point, I could tell you, we'll never negotiate with the Palestinian Authority as long as Hamas is in Gaza. That's not my position. I think we should get on with it and seek to negotiate peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. We'll have to deal with Hamas later.

WALLACE: But your foreign minister, Avigdor Liberman, says he sees, quote, "no chance - no chance" of a Palestinian state by 2012.

PM NETANYAHU: Well, you know, there are different views. There are people who have different ideas for a democracy. We're a parliamentary democracy, so people are entitled to have different views. They express them. But I think that there is no substitute for getting into direct talks right now and seeking to break this logger jam, to actually go ahead and try to negotiate a final peace deal...

WALLACE: Do you believe there can be a Palestinian state by 2012?

PM NETANYAHU: I think there can be a solution. It may be implemented over time because time is an important factor of getting the solution, both in terms of security arrangements and other things that would be difficult if they're not allowed to take place over time.
So can we have a negotiated peace? Yes.
Can it be implemented by 2012? I think it's going to take longer than that.

WALLACE: You say it's going to take courage on your part. Are you willing to put East Jerusalem as a possible capital of a Palestinian state on the table?

PM NETANYAHU: Well, we have differences of views with the Palestinians. We want a united city. They have their own views. This is one of the issues that will have to be negotiated. But I think the main point is to get on with it.

You know, somebody asked me today, why don't you negotiate with President Abbas? And I said I've been calling for a year and a quarter - ever since we formed a government - to have this negotiation. And the question I raise is what are we waiting for? What are we wasting more time for. Let's just get on with it.

WALLACE: President Obama and you this week were full of nice words about US-Israeli relations. But I think the real question is did you resolve some of the deep differences that exist between the Unites States and Israel when it comes to some of these issues? So let's get into specifics. Did the president explain why the U.S. signed a U.N. statement in May which singled out Israel's nuclear program and failed to mention Iran?

PM NETANYAHU: He said U.S. policy has not changed. He recognizes Israel's unique circumstances, the size of the vulnerability, the history of the attacks that we've had. And he reiterated in our private session and in the public statement some of the key understandings that we've had on this strategic area. So I think if anyone thought that there was a change of U.S. policy, or daylight, between Israel and the United States on these questions, I think he did a lot to lay that to rest.

WALLACE: Did he explicitly say to you that he accepts Israel's right to nuclear weapons for self-defense?

PM NETANYAHU: Well, we didn't get into that kind of a discussion and I'm not going to get into our confidential discussions.

WALLACE: What about the call which the U.S. endorsed at the U.N. for an international conference - a summit on making the Mideast a nuclear-free zone?

PM NETANYAHU: He said that he would not see Israel joining if it didn't feel comfortable with such a conference. And I think that was an important statement.

As far as a nuclear weapons-free zone, you know, and when the lion lies down with the lamb and you don't need a new lamb every day to satisfy the lion, then we might have this kind of transformation in the Middle East. But so far, you know who's been violating the nuclear non-proliferation pact day and night - those who signed it: Iran, Iraq, Libya. And Iran violates it while calling for Israel's destruction and racing to develop atomic weapons to that end.

So I think we should stay focused on the real problem in the Middle East. It's not Israel. It's these dictatorships that are developing nuclear weapons with the specific goal of wiping Israel away.

WALLACE: Have you and the president resolved the issue of whether you are willing to extend the moratorium on construction of settlements, as part of the Palestinians engaging in direct talks?

PM NETANYAHU: The settlements are an issue that have to be engaged in the final status peace negotiations. That's always been agreed on - along with other issues. I made the exceptional, really extraordinary move, of making a freeze on new construction for 10 months. I did that seven months ago, in order to help the Palestinians get into the talks. They haven't gotten into the talks right now.

Now we're asked to make an extension of this. Look, I think this is the wrong approach. I think we should eliminate all these preconditions and all these excuses and all those demands for entering into direct talks. We should just get into them.

WALLACE: During your meeting with President Obama, you praised the recent round of sanctions, not just the UN, but also the additional sanctions that President Obama signed that the U.S. Congress passed on Iran. But recently, the CIA director, Leon Panetta, said this: "Will it deter them" - speaking of the Iranians - "from their ambitions with regards to a nuclear capability? Probably not." Is Panetta right?

PM NETANYAHU: Probably. He's probably right. I can tell you one thing, that Iran is closer to developing nuclear weapons today than it was a week ago or a month ago or a year ago. It's just moving on with its efforts. And I think there is a great danger to the world, not only to my country, but to the United States, to the Middle East, to the peace, to all of humanity from the prospect that such a regime, that brutalizes its own people, that sponsors terrorism more than any other regime in the world, that this regime acquires atomic bombs is very, very dangerous.

WALLACE: U.S. officials estimate that Iran, perhaps within two years, will have a nuclear warhead it can put on a ballistic missile that can strike Israel, Europe, much of the world. Do you have a deadline in your own mind for how long your willing to let diplomacy play out?

PM NETANYAHU: There's only been one time that Iran actually stopped the program and that was when it feared U.S. military action. So when the president says that he is determined to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and that all options are on the table, I think that's the right statement of policy.

You ask what is our policy? Our policy is very simple: the Jewish state was set up to defend Jewish lives and we always reserve the right to defend ourselves.

WALLACE: Do you have a deadline in your mind for how long you're willing to let diplomacy play out?

PM NETANYAHU: Well, I think that we always reserve the right to defend ourselves.

WALLACE: Do you believe that a nuclear Iran can be contained?

PM NETANYAHU: No. No, I don't. I think that's a mistake. And I think that's a misconception.

WALLACE: So it must be stopped?

PM NETANYAHU: You can't rely on the fact that they'll obey the calculations of cost and benefit that have governed all nuclear powers since the rise of the nuclear age after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We've had effective nuclear peace for more than half a century because everybody understood the rules. I don't think you can rely on Iran, I don't think you can rely on other radicals like the Taliban - they dispatched al Qaeda to bomb New York and Washington.

What were they thinking? Were they that stupid? They weren't stupid. There is an irrationality here. And there's madness in this method. And we should not allow irrational regimes like Iran to have nuclear weapons. It's the ultimate terrorist threat today…

WALLACE: But I just want to follow your argument. You say that Panetta is probably right, that sanctions won't work. You say flatly that containing a nuclear Iran is impossible. Have you and the president ever discussed the possibility of a military strike?

PM NETANYAHU: I'm not going to get into the confidential discussions. And I'm not confirming anything of the sort. But I am saying that the president's position that all options are on the table might actually have the only real effect on Iran, if they think it's true.

WALLACE: This week, you relaxed restrictions on the goods that you're allowing to go into Gaza. But do you believe that Israel did anything wrong while it was intercepting that ship on May 31st and nine people were killed? Do you believe that there was an excessive use of force?

PM NETANYAHU: Oh, first of all, I think we regret the loss of lives. But I talked to the soldiers. I visited the wounded soldiers. I visited them in the hospital. One of them was shot. These activists, these Turkish radicals clubbed him, knifed him, took one of their weapons and fired at them. They were shot. And unfortunately, people were killed. But they acted in self-defense. Your Coast Guard would do the same. Would you feel that they did a terrible thing...

WALLACE: So no excessive force?

PM NETANYAHU: Certainly force that was used to defend their lives and they acted in self-defense, as I heard it directly from them. But I think we have a credible investigation. You know, in Israel's case, it's a real investigation, a real impartial, professional investigation. And it will come out. All these facts will come out.

WALLACE: And will you enforce the blockade against any other ships that try to test it?

PM NETANYAHU: We are enforcing the security blockade in order to prevent weapons and war materiel from getting into Gaza. I've lifted all the civilian - any civilian goods can enter. I've lifted the civilian blockade.

WALLACE: Right.

PM NETANYAHU: So anything can come in - food, medicine, toys, you name it. It can all go freely into Gaza. My policy is simple: weapons out, everything else in.

WALLACE: Finally, you have been dealing with American presidents for the better part of 30 years almost. How do you compare Barack Obama to the others?

PM NETANYAHU: I don't compare people. This is something you leave for biographers. But I can tell you there is a consistent line in all U.S. presidents, from everyone that I met, including President Obama, share what the president called the basic bedrock of this unbreakable bond between Israel and the United States. Israeli prime ministers are also different. Each one of us is different. But we all value the relationship with the United States enormously - enormously. I think America has no better friend and ally than Israel in the world and I'm sure that Israel has no better friend and ally than the United States.

WALLACE: Can you honestly say that Barack Obama supports Israel and understands the threats you face the same way that Reagan and Clinton and the two Bushes did?

PM NETANYAHU: I can tell you that we had a conversation in this meeting in Washington the other day. And a good chunk of it - I'd say about half of it - was devoted to a detailed discussion of Israel's security problems: the problem that when we vacate territory, Iran and its proxy terrorists walk in with rockets. And I explained it in great detail. And I found the president understanding, I found him - he considered this problem. He understands that we need to have a solution for it, and I intend to work with him and I hope with President Abbas, to find a solution so that we can couple security with peace, because that's the only peace that will endure, peace based on security.

I'm prepared to go down this route. I know the president is willing to assist us in this. But I need a partner on the other side. You know, you can't be a trapeze artist that wants to connect with the other guy and there's no one there. I need a Palestinian partner. And President Abbas, I don't know if you can go from trapeze artist to step up to the plate. He's got to step up to the plate.

WALLACE: Prime Minister Netanyahu, thank you so much for talking with us.

PM NETANYAHU: Thank you.

Are Jews for Obama in denial about building the framework for their own destruction?

Is this evidence of American Jews' failure to learn the lesson of "We're Germans first?" Infidel Blogger Alliance combines Jerusalem-based founder of Jewish Media Resources, Jonathan Rosenblum's well-reasoned editorial from with Memri TV's revelation from Palestinian Television of Islamists' preaching Muslims' obligation (and intention) to destroy) Jews everywhere.

"American Jews who are voting for Obama don't realize it, but they are voting against Israel as their state of asylum in case of another outbreak of anti-Semitism."

"The Jews were sentenced to annihilation, before even a single Jew existed on the face of the earth." - Palestinian cleric, Muhsen Abu 'Ita.

Infidel Bloggers adds 'American Islamist group Sabeel's Naim Ateek professes the Palestinian Authority to be a "liberation" movement.' Apparently, that must refer to the liberation of Jews from this world.

In Khalidi of the PLO, Jerusalem-based scholar, Martin Kramer, proves the strong PLO affiliation of Obama's ideological brother (which the mainstream media seeks to hide):

Rashid Khalidi was known to be affiliated with, and protected by Arafat’s Fatah. A 1979 New York Times report (by Youssef Ibrahim) described Khalidi as “a professor of political science who is close to Al Fatah.” In Beirut, to be “close” to an organization meant you enjoyed its protection in return for loyalty and services rendered.

Khalidi’s wife also worked as an English translator for the PLO’s press agency, Wafa.

So savvy journalists knew that if they wanted the Fatah spin, they could get it from Khalidi.

"The Jewish case against voting for Barack Obama" - video and articles

Watch syndicated columnist, Ben Shapiro's 3-part video (introduced first in its Preview) in which he presents concerns about the Obamania that is sweeping the nation.

The program examines Obama's advisors, friends, running mate, and own words. Part I (sequentially follows trailer, or is selectable from 2nd Menu Button) covers the introduction and explores his advisors. Then view Parts II and III for his friends, running mate, public statements, and summary.



Particularly important is Barack Obama's team's worrying ideology that America's War on Terror would be better served by handing the Islamists a hostile state in the midst of a bi-sected Israel; and the Obama-team's plan to reprioritize American policy to ally with Islamism - and against Jewish interests in preserving the safety of the Jewish refuge of Israel.

Worthwhile viewing for anyone concerned about the reprioritizing of US policy away from assuring Israel's safety and towards emboldening global Islamism by increasing Iranian regional and global hegemony by attempting to appease the belligerent, Islamist States of Iran and Saudi Arabia, through Obama's team with those self-declared intentions.

Journalist Ed Lasky of American Thinker has detailed many concerns about the anti-Israel character of Obama and his choices for his administration - (in January '08- even before he pulled Robert Malley and Samantha Powers from campaign visibility).
Obama's soothing and inspiring oratory sometimes vanishes when he talks of the Middle East. Indeed, his off-the-cuff remarks have been uniformly taken by supporters of Israel as signs that the inner Obama does not truly support Israel despite what his canned speeches and essays may contain.

Now that Obama has become a leading Presidential candidate, he has assembled a body of foreign policy advisers who signal that a President Obama would likely have an approach towards Israel radically at odds with those of previous Presidents (both Republican and Democrat). A group of experts collected by the Israeli liberal newspaper Haaretz deemed him to be the candidate likely to be least supportive of Israel. He is the candidate most favored by the Arab-American community. ...

Obama has, on his own volition, assembled his networks of friends, mentors, financial supporters and foreign policy advisers. In his judgment -- a judgment that he regularly trumpets as being superior to others - these people are worthy of advising him. There are among those friends and advisers key people who seem to display a great deal of antipathy towards the American-Israel relationshipRead it all

American Thinker lists other sources which document concerns about the Obama's team's anti-Israelism:

Those concerned about Obama and Israel include (click original for links):

Former Israel Ambassador to America Daniel Ayalon (Who Are You Barack Obama?) wherein the Ambassador expressed concern regarding Obama's approach toward Iran and also, based on his own personal experience with Obama dealing on issues concerning the American-Israel relationship, stating that he was left with an "impression that he was not entirely forthright with his thinking";

Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick, who also took on Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul in this column;

Jerusalem Post Editorial Page editor Saul Singer (Obama's Mixed Record on Iran );

The New York Post; Writer Hillel Halkin (Obama Gets Israel Wrong);

An American Jewish Committee internal memo questioned Obama's potential approach to Middle East policy;

Commentary Magazine writer Noah Pollak criticized Obama's appointment of Robert Malley and Samantha Power as foreign policy advisers. Pollak notes in a recent post that Power (a key and very public foreign adviser to Senator Obama) echoes the views of Zbigniew Brezenski in calling for "special interest groups" influence over foreign policy to be abolished. Power has also called for the elimination of foreign aid to Israel and its redirection to "Palestine", as well as the massive imposition of US military forces in the area to bring about and enforce a settlement (where, of course, they could find themselves easy targets and be subject to propaganda attacks as another imperial foray into the Middle East).

The blog Powerline has also raised questions regarding Obama;

Slate magazine writer Mickey Kaus has long wondered why Obama and his close relationship with Pastor Wright has all but escaped any media scrutiny and has pointed out that Wright's racial divisiveness is in sharp contrast to Obama's campaign mantra of unity. Many other very credible commentators have raised these issues and others. Yet critics of Lasky's articles have all but ignored the criticism arising from these quarters.

Now why do we bring these people into the discussion? To show that there are serious questions that a wide variety of commentators, including a former Ambassador, have regarding Barack Obama and Israel.

Fact-checking Obama's solicitation to 900 congregational rabbis pre-High Holy Days

by Ed Lasky in American Thinker

Barack Obama held a conference call this week with more than 900 rabbis (does the Obama campaign do anything that is not on a grandiose scale?) to extend greetings to them and their congregants ahead of Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year. I am unaware if he has ever held such a conference call before but he is in a tight Presidential race with the Jewish vote playing a key role in several battleground states. Many in the community have concerns about Barack Obama's support for Israel and the sincerity of the statements he has made on the campaign trail. Here is a quick fact-check after his latest expression of support for Israel:

He had this to say on the call:

It's important "to recognize that throughout my career in the State Legislature and now in the U.S. Senate, I have been a stalwart friend of Israel," said Obama. "On every single issue related to Israel's security, I have been unwavering, and will continue to be unwavering."
 Let's see how what he says matches up with his record.